The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
This served new hypothesis your rationalist epistemology appears towards the a great reduced level of engagement into the Engagement subscale plus the constructivist epistemology seems into an elevated standard of involvement to the Wedding subscale
For this reason citas con reclusas, epistemology (rationalist compared to. constructivist) try seen to be a critical predictor out-of cures concept. Particularly, the most robust results promote provisional support towards opinion one to there are particular variations in the private form of the brand new counselor according to therapists’ epistemic assumptions. Far more specifically, the modern research discovered that therapists having rationalist epistemologies tended toward much more distance, a lowered amount of involvement, an excellent narrower focus, and an increased level of thought in their lessons that have subscribers, while, brand new constructivist epistemology tended for the that have a greater amount of closeness, an elevated degree of involvement, a broader focus, and love of life within treatment instructions. Simultaneously, discover some support into notion you to therapists that have constructivist epistemologies are most likely to the the new recommendations regarding independency in the place of tightness during the its therapy style; but not it was not a really solid shopping for in the modern data.
This type of findings are useful when it comes to the fresh new potentially built-in differences managed of the rationalist in place of constructivist epistemologies based on procedures concept. Alot more especially, newest conclusions secure the sense one to intellectual-behavioral therapies, and therefore represent an informed portrayal of the rationalist epistemology, care for an enthusiastic “active-directive” and you may scientific method of therapy (Granvold, 1988) which have certain needs accustomed plan the course of your own lesson (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).
Hypothesis 2-Epistemology Impacts the latest Healing Relationships
With regards to the second hypothesis-therapists with rationalist epistemologies usually score highest on the Activity and you can Purpose subscales and lower into Thread subscale compared to the constructivist epistemologies-several other numerous linear regression model try used to choose when your same predictor variable (specialist epistemology) would determine therapists’ product reviews of one’s traditional details (performing alliance) considering therapists’ millions of around three subscales-Activity, Goal, and you will Bond.